Adipurush: A Modern Retelling of Ramayan or a Cinematic Travesty?

Adipurush: A Modern Retelling of Ramayan or a Cinematic Travesty?

The much-anticipated film Adipurush, a modern interpretation of the ancient Indian epic Ramayan, has generated considerable buzz and divided opinions among audiences. While reinterpretations and fresh perspectives can be welcomed, it is important to examine whether the film successfully captures the essence of the epic or if it strays too far, resulting in a cinematic travesty. This article delves into the social and political ramifications of making a modern version of Ramayan, evaluating the liberties taken by Adipurush and its potential impact on viewers.

A Departure from Authenticity

The film's authenticity is brought into question from the beginning, as cherry blossoms in Sri Lanka, Hanuman speaking in colloquial language, and the Gothic portrayal of Sone ki Lanka challenge the traditional imagery associated with the Ramayan. The visual elements seem more inspired by Western fantasies and amusement parks rather than the original text or historical references, leaving Indian audiences potentially disconnected from the narrative.

A Clash of Mythologies

Adipurush introduces elements such as asuras resembling dementors and the inclusion of orcs, dragons, and Jurassic-era creatures. These additions seem to cater to a desire to showcase VFX prowess, possibly aiming to compete with Western fantasy films. However, this deviation from the core mythology of Ramayan may alienate Indian audiences and dilute the essence of the epic.

A Visual Disconnect

The film's dark exteriors and visually grandiose interiors of Raavan's palace, reminiscent of Game of Thrones or other Hollywood fantasy franchises, further distance the audience from the original cultural context. Such stylistic choices, while visually appealing, may contribute to a loss of authenticity and fail to resonate with viewers seeking a faithful representation of the Ramayan.

Diluted Performances

Despite the scale of action and visual effects, the performances by the actors appear overshadowed. Prabhas, as Raghav, manages to exude serenity, but struggles when placed in dream sequences or romantic songs. Saif Ali Khan's portrayal of Raavan feels disconnected from the film's overall tone, and the remaining cast members, including Sunny Singh, Kriti Sanon, and Devdutta Nage as Hanuman, make valiant efforts but are limited by the film's circumstances.

An Ear-Splitting Score

While a few melodious bhajans manage to capture the essence of the story, the film's background score largely fails to strike the right chord. Instead, it tends to be ear-splitting, possibly overwhelming the viewer and detracting from the emotional depth of the narrative.


In the only truly effective scene of the film, Ram inspires his army to fight for their place in history rather than for him. However, the liberties taken by the filmmakers in Adipurush may distort the essence of the epic. The modernization of Ramayan undoubtedly presents challenges, and while reinterpretations can be valuable, it is crucial to strike a balance between fresh perspectives and maintaining cultural authenticity. Ultimately, the film's deviation from traditional imagery, inclusion of fantastical elements, and questionable visual choices risk disconnecting audiences from the rich cultural heritage of the Ramayan.